Articles : Page 1 of 1
-
June 26th Links: ASP.NET, ASP.NET MVC, .NET and NuGet
Jun 1127Here is the latest in my link-listing series. Also check out my Best of 2010 Summary for links to 100+ other posts I’ve done in the last year. [I am also now using Twitter for quick updates and to share links. Follow me at: twitter.com/scottgu] ASP.NET Introducing new ASP.NET Universal Providers: Great post from Scott Hanselman on the new System.Web.Providers we are working on. This release delivers new ASP.NET Membership, Role Management, Session, Profile providers that work with SQL Ser...
-
Bin Deploying ASP.NET MVC 3
May 1126When you build an ASP.NET MVC 3 application and are ready to deploy it to your hosting provider, there are a set of assemblies you’ll need to include with your application for it to run properly, unless they are already installed in the Global Assembly Cache (GAC) on the server. In previous versions of ASP.NET MVC, this set of assemblies was rather small. In fact, it was only one assembly, System.Web.Mvc.dll, though in the case of ASP.NET MVC 1.0, if you didn’t have SP1 of .NET 3.5 installed...
-
DynamicModuleUtility
Feb 1128One of the interesting side-effects of installing ASP.NET MVC 3 is the appearance of Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure in the GAC. Inside the assembly is a DynamicModuleUtility class that will let you do the following: using System; using System.Web; using Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure.DynamicModuleHelper; [assembly:PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(MyAppStart), "Start")] public class CoolModule : IHttpModule { // implementation not important // imagine something cool here } public static class My...
-
Running an ASP.NET MVC 3 app on a web server that doesn’t have ASP.NET MVC 3 installed
Jan 1119Last week we released several new web products – including ASP.NET MVC 3. We’ve had a bunch of great feedback and a ton of downloads since then. One question a few people have asked me recently is: “My web hosting provider doesn’t yet support ASP.NET MVC 3 - any idea when they will install it?” The good news is that you don’t need to wait for them to install anything on their web-servers. As long as your web hosting provider supports .NET 4, then you can build and deploy ASP.NET MVC 3 app...
-
Integrating ASP.NET MVC 3 into existing upgraded ASP.NET 4 Web Forms applications
Jan 1106I got an interesting question recently from a gentleman who has an existing ASP.NET WebForms 2.0 application that works just fine. He's upgraded it to ASP.NET 4 and it still works great, but now he wants to add some ASP.NET MVC pages to it. He doesn't want to rewrite the application. A few years ago I did a post on Hybrid ASP.NET applications. The goal was to reinforce the point that you can have ASP.NET applications that are both WebForms and MVC (as well as WCF and ASMX Web Services and o...
-
Hosting the Razor Engine for Templating in Non-Web Applications
Dec 1028Microsoft’s new Razor HTML Rendering Engine that is currently shipping with ASP.NET MVC previews can be used outside of ASP.NET. Razor is an alternative view engine that can be used instead of the ASP.NET Page engine that currently works with ASP.NET WebForms and MVC. It provides a simpler and more readable markup syntax and is much more light weight in terms of functionality than the full blown WebForms Page engine, focusing only on features that are more along the lines of a pure view engine...
-
BIN Deploying ASP.NET MVC 3 with Razor to a Windows Server without MVC installed
Nov 1024If someone says just bin Deploy it they mean deploy the application with the dependencies copied into the application's /bin folder, rather than running an MSI that installs the dependencies into the Global Assembly Cache (GAC). You may not have administrative control over your Web Server and your host may not want you running installers when new stuff like ASP.NET MVC 3 and Razor comes out. You'll want to bin deploy these new technologies. Here's two ways. The simple way and The Awesome...
- 1
